Latest Tweets

  •  

Overwhelming Victory or Victory by Overwhelming?

Posted by Meg | Posted in BarackNObama.net, Campaign 2008, Editorial, Media Bias, Must See, Obama, PUMA Power, Socialism | Posted on 05-11-2008

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

1

Considering everything that was on Obama’s side and everything that was against John McCain, it’s so important that we realize how very close this election was. Consider the following facts:

    - Obama had $650 million dollars at his disposal. McCain stuck to public financing, which limited him to $84 million. Obama outspent McCain 5:1.

    – The Mainstream Media. On the three network evening newscasts, 65% positive for Obama/Biden while coverage of McCain/Palin was 36%. Between the end of the primaries and the end of October, network news broadcast 84 stories criticizing McCain ads, but only 32% had a negative tone towards Obama. Obama appeared on over 50 magazine covers. As I showed you, he was granted 13 Time Magazine covers, compared to McCain’s 4.

    - After the primary, Obama made a mad dash for the center. Once he was the Democratic nominee, he flip-flopped his way to the center. He was a radical leftist in moderate clothing, a la the Emperor and his new clothes.

After all of that, after all the outspending, media hype, and flip-flopping, that only just gave him the victory. Yes, he won by a fair margin with the electoral college, but if you look at the vote-for-vote count, it was very, very close. Obama won by pretty much the exact same margin that Bush won by in 2004. After all of that, it only bought Obama just over 62 million votes. He had to outspend McCain 5:1, he had the media in his back pocket, he flip-flopped his way to the center, and yet even then, he couldn’t win by a landslide. He did not win as the leftist he’s been throughout his career. He did not win as the Senate’s most liberal senator. He had to win by putting on a centrist costume and outspending the Republicans.

The Democrats are calling this a revolution. I hardly think so. We Americans are the center, we are not Nancy Pelosi, we are not Harry Reid. But in the same vein, we are also not Jerry Fallwell. We are not extremists! When considering everything it took to give Obama this victory, this does not change who we are and where the majority of us sit on the political landscape.
Please do not let the Democrats sway you, do not believe them when they try to convince you that moderate and conservative politics are over and done with. We are not dead, we were simply out spent, out maneuvered, and quite frankly, overwhelmed by the sheer size, scope, and wallet of Obama’s campaign.
In short, we can no longer afford to be the silent majority. We must get organized, we must prepare ourselves, we must change the way in which we approach the political landscape. But above all else, we must not be convinced to give up our principles. They may have overwhelmed us financially, but that does not mean we give up what we believe in. That does not mean we throw in the towel and become radical leftist socialists ourselves. It just means we’re going to have to speak up, stand up for what we believe in, and fight tooth and nail for the principles we believe in and the country that we love.

This nation has just elected another Jimmy Carter. But remember, it took Jimmy Carter to bring us Ronald Reagan.
Hold fast, everybody. It’s going to be a bumpy four years, but we can hold firm, we can stay strong, and we can stand up for what we believe in. It’s time to pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and keep on fighting.

Comments (1)

Obama won the election by nearly the exact same margin that the Gay Marriage Ban won in California, but opponents of Proposition 8 were still saying the margin was “razor thin” and “too close to call” all night on Tuesday.

I wouldn’t underestimate the significance of his victory. Yes, it was close in the popular vote and particularly so given the enormous advantages you cite. But Obama made considerable gains in areas he had no business winning, testimony to the incredible organization of his campaign and the value of the contentious primary.

If Republicans cannot regroup, focus on a message, and find an intelligent and energizing candidate to face him in 2012, we may have to put up with My Hero, Zero for eight years. That may not be a bad thing for Republicans. If they wish to ever regain the White House and Congress, it will take a marvelous screw-up by the Democrats to do it – and now they OWN both the praise and blame of the next four years.

Republicans must face the reality of changing demographics and an unfriendly media. That’s the political battleground on which we fight. They don’t get to choose the terrain. They have to win in unfriendly territory.

Look on the bright side: we’ve got four years to give Obama and Democrats exactly the same loyalty and support that they gave George W. Bush and our troops. :)

Keep a scorecard of Obama’s broken promises and watch how he lowers the bar on expectations of his achievements.

Find out the names of the ten boys in that cult-like Obama video and figure out where they are in four years. I’d wager only one out of the ten reaches the goal to which Obama “inspired” them, although I would wish all of them would succeed. Having taught in colleges and universities for over 14 years, I know better.

Last point: on the bus Tuesday evening, a hopeful liberal was complaining about how screwed up our Electoral College is. He was obviously a chinese immigrant and not well-educated in our system, but neither are most Americans. The Electoral College (based on the two-chamber Congress of the Connecticut Compromise) was designed to balance the power of large and small states. Without it, candidates wouldn’t address issues important to small states – only large populations centers.

I suspect, though, that given the large electoral tilt, this guy is silent on the subject by today.

Write a comment