Oh, Britain, Britain, Britain… when did you decide to jump in bed with Islam? And like most one night stands, how can you possibly expect anything good to come of it?
This doesn’t even sound real as I type it, but the UK’s Channel 4 has announced that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will deliver their annual Christmas address this year. For quite a long time now, Channel 4 has relished in choosing a somewhat controversial alternative to the annual Queen’s Christmas address, delivered every year on Christmas day by the BBC. But no previous year possibly compares to the choice for 2008, and no previous choice seems so outlandishly stupid. Because hey, nothing portrays the spirit of Christmas quite like a Muslim leader raving about how much he wishes he could exterminate the Jews, right?

But of course, none of that was quite as disturbing as the tease that was given about what Ahmadinejad will be discussing this Christmas. What’s his message going to be? According to the AP, “In his message, Ahmadinejad says that if Jesus was alive in modern society he would likely fight to reform the world’s economic and political systems.”
Yes, Mahmoud, and if Christ were alive today, I think you might want to be just a tad bit concerned, given all the things you’ve said about His Chosen People. Remember, Christ may have been truly peace loving, but never forget the money changers He threw out of the temple; there is such a thing as righteous indignation, and since there was none more righteous than He, the indignation can be truly terrible and truly justified.
But more importantly than that, how dare he preach to us about our Lord on our high holy day! What do you think the outrage would be if a Christian went to Mecca on Eid ul-Adha to preach to all of Islam about what the Prophet Muhammed would have to say if he were alive today? Somehow I doubt all we would be met with was a barrage of angry blog entries. No, there would be blood running in the streets; our streets, our blood.

I sincerely hope that the UK will wake up to what their multi-cultural, politically correct, and ultimately naive atmosphere has done to the rest of the West. By allowing monsters such as Ahmadinejad into your country, into your homes, into your very way of life, you are giving terrorism a foothold in the west. You’re giving them precisely what they desire, everything they need to wipe every last infidel off the face of this Earth, i.e. you, me, and everyone else who isn’t a Muslim. Or have you not noticed that so many terrorists have been born and raised right in your own British backyard?
Wake up to what you’re doing to all of us. And on Christmas no less.

Merry Christmas, everybody.

This is absurd. Peter Wallsten, a reporter from the LA Times, apparently is in possession of a video from an event Barack Obama attended in 2003. At this event, Barack Obama delivered a toast. This video could be quite important and, in my opinion, voters deserve to see it. Why?
Because this 2003 event was hosted in honor of Rashid Khalidi, a critic of Israel, advocate for Palestinian rights, and quite frankly, a hate-speech-spewing Jew-basher. Coincidentally, he is also a best friend of Bill Ayers.
There’s been a lot of speculation and talk, claiming that Barack Obama is very familiar with Rashid Khalidi, that they went to events together all the time, that they were close friends, and that they often shared long family dinners where they discussed Palestinian rights. Of course, Barack Obama denies this, because Rashid Khalidi doesn’t exactly have the nicest track record.

Well, apparently this video would show just exactly how whitewashed this relationship is. According to Wallsten, this video features a toast delivered by Barack Obama, where he discusses his many talks with the Khalidis. Obama said, these talks had been “consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases… It’s for that reason that I’m hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation — a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid’s dinner table,” but around “this entire world.”
Additional portions of the dinner are also on the video tape, showing Obama participating in the many discussions at the event about Jews, Israel, and the problem they present to Islam. According to Wallsten, “During the dinner a young Palestinian American recited a poem accusing the Israeli government of terrorism in its treatment of Palestinians and sharply criticizing U.S. support of Israel. If Palestinians cannot secure their own land, she said, ‘then you will never see a day of peace.’ One speaker likened ‘Zionist settlers on the West Bank’ to Osama bin Laden, saying both had been ‘blinded by ideology.’”

This has been a side of Barack Obama that many people have speculated about, and many former colleagues from Chicago have expounded upon. Hell, even Rashid Khalidi himself has talked very openly about the relationship he and Barack Obama shared.
Yet the media’s still choosing to ignore this issue, instead decided to believe Obama 100%, despite the vast array of evidence stacked up against him.

THIS is the media bias everyone’s been talking about, right there. Do you honestly think that if any reporter had such damning evidence about John McCain or Sarah Palin, do you honestly think they’d refuse to release it? If it was John McCain attending a dinner in honor of someone who supported and promoted hate crimes, where the entire event devolved into a relentless bashing of a minority, and then McCain proceeded to deliver a toast in honor of such a man, that it wouldn’t be all over the news every minute of every day until the election? Seriously, we heard all about the completely made up claims about Sarah Palin supposedly attempting to ban books, yet stuff like this is ignored? The claim against Sarah Palin was completely false, yet here we have absolute evidence that shows Barack Obama openly bashing Jews and supporting hate speech, and that’s what ends up getting buried?

Seriously, if we don’t wake up, we’re going to end up going to hell in a hand basket. If we don’t wake up and start demanding responsible journalism from our nation’s media, we will have invited our own destruction. When we have such little regard for the truth that we will allow such behavior to continue, we are indeed hopeless.

(The best summary of this issue is from Gateway Pundit. Just so you’re aware, they are a conservative blog. As you know, I try to find as moderate a source as possible, but in this case, the reason I’m linking to them is because the blogger actually had direct contact with Peter Wallsten and detailed the conversation they had about the tape. It’s honestly the best and most direct synopsis of the situation. So please, check it out.)